The Michelson & Morley experiment and BS

What a load of BS.

The famous, but over rated experiment was designed to demonstrate the existence of the "Lumniferious Ether", the absolute reference frame. Or near to it.The test failed, aparenty had a null result (almost but not quite) No one could think why the experiment did not provide the expected result, but then again in Einstein's time, they were a bit ignorant about some things. (more on this in the next installment)

Then Einstein came along and claimed that it PROVED that there was NO Ether, No Absolute Reference frame, BUT that the experiment actually PROVED that light speed is exactly the same for all inertial reference frames, thus supporting his Special Relativity theory.

Now for or a claimed GENIUS, this is a really STUPID statement. And because modern "Expert Physicists" today also make the same statement, I have to put them into the same category as I place Einstein.

Why?

Because as every Relativist knows, there is no such thing as the Ether, and you are an imbecile if you think there could be. Einstein emphatically stated that there was no ether.

No Ether according to the worlds most respected scientists even today. 

Einstein also claims that there is no absolute frame of reference.

But if you remove an absolute frame of reference, the Ether, from this experiment, then there is nothing remaining with which to compare the two paths of the light.

All you have is a guy shining a torch on the north and then west walls of his room, (effectively) and declaring that this somehow prevents light from slowing down or speeding up under any other circumstances, anywhere else in the universe!

BUT, In order to use the M&M experiment to support the idea that light speed is fixed regardless of the observer or speed of the emitter, you MUST believe and agree that the ETHER IS REAL, and that the light SHOULD have slowed down when directed upstream into the Ether wind.

So, ONLY if there was really an Ether wind of 30mps (whatever) AND ONLY if the wind was able to be detected, can anyone claim that light was NOT behaving according to what is "supposed to happen" in the Ether wind.

Only then can you say that the light, even though it should have slowed down in one direction and not the other BECAUSE OF THE ETHER, did not slow down, proving that light goes the same speed anywhere, even though it should not, according to the existence of the Ether wind effect.

Take away the Ether wind, and you have nothing. No evidence whatsoever of the universality and consistency of light speed.

If you really want to keep the “Constancy of Light speed”, then you MUST accept fully the existence of the Ether, and agree that Einstein is wrong about Frames of Reference. And that therefore Special Relativity is wrong.

Take your pick.

You can’t have it both ways.

This proves that there is absolutely no basis for Special Relativity.

It’s dead in the water.

Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. (Monolopy game)

This does not mean that I am claiming that there is an Ether.

I don’t know, but I do know when I hear BS.

Einstein’s theories fall into the latter category.

The Michelson & Morley experiment and BS

What a load of BS.

The famous, but over rated experiment was designed to demonstrate the existence of the "Lumniferious Ether", the absolute reference frame. Or near to it.The test failed, aparenty had a null result (almost but not quite) No one could think why the experiment did not provide the expected result, but then again in Einstein's time, they were a bit ignorant about some things. (more on this in the next installment)

Then Einstein came along and claimed that it PROVED that there was NO Ether, No Absolute Reference frame, BUT that the experiment actually PROVED that light speed is exactly the same for all inertial reference frames, thus supporting his Special Relativity theory.

Now for or a claimed GENIUS, this is a really STUPID statement. And because modern "Expert Physicists" today also make the same statement, I have to put them into the same category as I place Einstein.

Why?

Because as every Relativist knows, there is no such thing as the Ether, and you are an imbecile if you think there could be. Einstein emphatically stated that there was no ether.

No Ether according to the worlds most respected scientists even today. 

Einstein also claims that there is no absolute frame of reference.

But if you remove an absolute frame of reference, the Ether, from this experiment, then there is nothing remaining with which to compare the two paths of the light.

All you have is a guy shining a torch on the north and then west walls of his room, (effectively) and declaring that this somehow prevents light from slowing down or speeding up under any other circumstances, anywhere else in the universe!

BUT, In order to use the M&M experiment to support the idea that light speed is fixed regardless of the observer or speed of the emitter, you MUST believe and agree that the ETHER IS REAL, and that the light SHOULD have slowed down when directed upstream into the Ether wind.

So, ONLY if there was really an Ether wind of 30mps (whatever) AND ONLY if the wind was able to be detected, can anyone claim that light was NOT behaving according to what is "supposed to happen" in the Ether wind.

Only then can you say that the light, even though it should have slowed down in one direction and not the other BECAUSE OF THE ETHER, did not slow down, proving that light goes the same speed anywhere, even though it should not, according to the existence of the Ether wind effect.

Take away the Ether wind, and you have nothing. No evidence whatsoever of the universality and consistency of light speed.

If you really want to keep the “Constancy of Light speed”, then you MUST accept fully the existence of the Ether, and agree that Einstein is wrong about Frames of Reference. And that therefore Special Relativity is wrong.

Take your pick.

You can’t have it both ways.

This proves that there is absolutely no basis for Special Relativity.

It’s dead in the water.

Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. (Monolopy game)

This does not mean that I am claiming that there is an Ether.

I don’t know, but I do know when I hear BS.

Einstein’s theories fall into the latter category.

Mobirise
Author

Mark Ross
Derby
Tasmania  Australia

Contact

Email: zeccano(swap for "@")yandex.com